COMMENTS TO THE SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN ARTICLE ON         MULTIPLE UNIVERSES;

On the cover of the may 2003 issue of Scientific American magazine, it says "infinite earths in parallel universes really exist." Such statements are not only not in any way scientifically proven, but may also possibly be not even probable in principle.

Such extreme and unscientific statements in a magazine about science also have a major impact on the dialog about what is the probability of there being a creator of the universe. The truth is that there is much evidence that either requires the existence of a creator or the belief in an actual infinite number of universes. The later is much less probable than the existence of a creator as long as the probability of the existence of a creator is less than one chance in an actual infinity.

The reality is that the statement on the magazine cover is only another large atheistic extrapolation of science theories and assumptions. Sadly, this is not unusual for this magazine or for scientists trying to make their findings sound more important than they really are. (The later is not surprising since scientists get the funding for their research based, to a large extent, on the perceived importance of their research.)

Science should at first be able to come up with a reasonable complete explanation for the nature of this universe before it starts talking about any other universe, let alone an extremely large, let alone an actual infinite number of other universes.

Origin of the Universe.

The origin of matter and other universe mysteries.

Atheists' solution - untestable "science"

Traveling Through Time: A Conversation with Paul Davies