HOW COULD THAT HAVE EVOLVED, BY SELECTION FROM PURE CHANCE BASED VARIATIONS IN GENES?

Fascinating instances where Darwinian theory of evolution almost certainly cannot be the whole explanation;

1) BUTTERFLIES form from caterpillars when the caterpillar "decides" to trap itself in a cocoon and dissolve itself down to a liquid mass of goo while retaining control of itself sufficiently to activate and precisely control an entirely different set of instructions to build the body all over again with a whole new design.

2) there is an orchid which is dependent on extremely unlikely coordinated set of events to be pollinated. In this plant, a bug has to climb in and accidentally slip down into a pool of fluid, the bug then climbs out of the fluid through a hole where there is a mechanism which senses the bug and which pins the bug down and then glues pollen to the bugs back and holds the bug only until the glue is set and then releases the bug to take the pollen to another plant which has another mechanism which takes the glued-on pollen from the bugs back to pollinate the second plant!
The Amazing Orchid.

 If Darwinism were true, think about the incredible sequence of the operations needed to be invented and how worthless each step would be without all the other steps in the process.  Darwinism would need to have each stage not only fully functional and survivable, but more survivable.  Improbable in the extreme.

There are many strange plants and insect relationships.  CLICK HERE FOR A FASCINATING SITE ABOUT INSECTS.

 3) Even microscopic life is incredibly complex. Each cell in your body has at least 20,000 molecular motors. Each cell in your body has a tram system and the cell puts packages of nutrients on the tram which are marked for their destination in the cell and are then taken off the tram at the correct destination. Our cells are called eukaryotic as contrasted to microbial cells which are call prokaryotic like an E. Coli bacteria. Eukaryotic cells are much more complex than prokaryotic. There are no evolutionary intermediates across this large gap. Even NANOARCHEA, which is about the simplest of all living cells, has over 500,000,000 DNA base pairs! Five hundred million is not simple to state the obvious and is not likely to have evolved via survival selection from random changes, to say the least.

4) there is an  INSECT IN NEW ZEALAND CALLED THE WETA that has miniature tusks which if scaled up in size would look just like elephant tusks. No one would believe that this proves that elephants evolved from beetles.  Similarity does not prove ancestral relationship.

Life is not just simply a collection of molecular bricks/building blocks, but rather an integrated collections of  MOLECULAR MACHINES.  Even at the simplest levels it is mind bending in complexity. How could such complexity have arisen from selection from random variations. The simplest forms of life are far to complex to be explained as founded by additive survival selection from a collection of random variations.

5) DNA is a complex and stable molecule that requires a complex set of  MOLECULAR MACHINES  to reproduce. These machines are made of proteins which require DNA to be assembled themselves. This is possibly the ultimate chicken and egg problem which cannot be reasonable explained by Darwinian evolution.

These examples of problems for the Darwinian dogma are typical of many such problems found in all of the life which covers this PLANET.  There is a fascinating book on nature and the incredible nature of life and difficulties for Darwinism.  We strongly recommend reading the book or the book review of "Beyond Natural Selection" by Robert Wesson.  (We disagree, however, with his conclusion that HOX genes are the answer.)  The HOX paradox. This book is easy to understand and shows how interesting science can be.  While not the authors overt intent (it is likely he would have feared for his job if he overtly questioned evolution dogma), this book gives numerous examples where Darwinian evolution is at a loss to explain the  incredible complexity and organization of life with a reasonable probability explanation.

Scientist, Dr. D. Kenyon, who wrote one of the mainline books on evolution "Biochemical predestination (Doctorate in biophysics and professor of biology at S.F. State University in Calif.) has, through his studies, come to believe that Darwinism cannot be the full explanation and that design of some type must also be involved in evolution.

Link to a list of assumptions made by Darwin macro evolutionists.

A list of essentially impossible to evolve life forms and features.

Generalized life cycle of scyphozoan jellyfishes, even simple life not really simple.

Our evolution views.

We recommend the book; "The Case For A Creator" by L. Strobel.