{ Science Truth...Assume Nothing }

THE DANGER TO OUR CHILDREN FROM THE ATHEISTIC/REDUCTIONIST BIASED TEACHING OF SCIENCE, OR WHAT IS CLAIMED TO BE SCIENCE BUT WHAT IS NOT TRUE SCIENCE:

1) SCIENCE GIVES THE OFTEN MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF OBJECTIVE THINKING.

2) SCIENCE APPEARS TO BE AUTHORITATIVE.

3) SCIENCE APPEARS TO EXPLAINS SO MUCH THAT IT IS EASY TO ASSUME (IN ERROR) THAT IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING.

4) SCIENCE IS TAUGHT TO CHILDREN AS A KEY TO THEIR FUTURE.

5) SCIENCE TEACHERS DO NOT TEACH THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE.

6) SCIENCE TEACHERS DO NOT TEACH THE INCONSISTENCIES OF SCIENCE.

7) SCIENCE TEACHERS DO NOT TEACH THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SCIENTISTS.

8) SCIENCE TEACHERS GIVE OUT GRADES WHICH INEVITABLY REQUIRE THE CHILDREN TO SHOW BELIEF IN WHAT IS TAUGHT.

9) THE PHYSICAL NATURE OF SCIENCE MAKES IT EASIER FOR STUDENTS TO ACCEPT THAN SUBTLER RELIGIOUS IDEAS.

10) SCIENCE SUPPOSEDLY DEALS IN PROOFS (OFTEN NOT TRUE); SCIENCE DOES NOT PROVIDE THE ABSOLUTE ANSWERS IT SEEMS TO; RELIGION DEALS IN BELIEFS WHICH ARE MORE DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.

11) SCIENCE ORGANIZATIONS PROVIDE TEACHING MATERIALS BIASED TO ATHEISTIC BELIEFS WHICH ARE AMORAL AT BEST.

12) SCIENCE TEACHERS WHO ARE OF FAITH ARE FAR TOO OFTEN RESTRAINED BY REGULATIONS/UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS OR COURT INTERPRETATIONS OF OUR LAWS (WHICH SHOULD BE FREEDOM OF RELIGION, NOT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION) FROM TEACHING ANY RELIGIOUS IMPLICATIONS OTHER THAN ATHEISTIC POSITIONS. (TEACHERS ARE NOT PREVENTED FROM TEACHING ATHEISTIC PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS WHICH IN TRUTH FLY IN THE FACE OF THE FACTS.)

We believe that there is a big difference between teaching religious implications of science and teaching a specific religion. In any case, however, at least the presence of incredible design in the universe (pointing with a high probability towards a Designer) should be taught as part of science if atheistic propaganda is to be allowed to be brought up on the other side.

Please note, we do not advocate the teaching in public schools of any specific religion. Our objection is to allowing the one sided presentation of science (or what is falsely claimed to be a scientific position) as supporting ath4eistic beliefs.

THE REALITY IS THAT OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING TAUGHT WHAT IS ESSENTIALLY AND ATHEISTIC RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

There are others who are seriously examining what can be taught in school without infringing the constitution or causing any particular religious group (like atheists) a problem. ASA SCIENCE EDUCATION SITE. (We suggest reading the second and thirds paragraphs from the end in particular. )

We do believe, in any case, however, that each student should receive an education in sociology which includes discussions of what is clearly good and evil and without bringing religion, the teaching of the social values which have historically made this country great. Sadly, those values which used to be" ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" (JFK). Not only have the values of the ten commandments been shoved aside but also basic societal values, mostly by the special interest groups much more interested in themselves than in society.

Aside from science, we need to get back to teaching ethics and morals (the ten commandments can be taught as proven historical values of the majority of the world without reference to any specific religion/faith) and the need to be concerned about what we can do for our country. We need to do something to prevent public schools from brainwashing our children with atheistic religious (faith only in the power of nature) beliefs, especially in science class. Sadly colleges are loaded with atheistic extreme left wing professors.

One specific thing we need to do is to teach the evolution controversy, about Darwinian macro evolution. Science, especially unproven science, of any nature should not be taught as unquestionable truth unless it is based only on repeatable laboratory tests. Darwinian macro evolution is not such laboratory science. Only micro evolution can be demonstrated in a lab. (We do not include creating deformed flies from normal flies as any proof of macro evolution.)

In summary, science teaching must not be allowed to continue to include atheistic philosophy (the unfounded belief that nature holds all the answers and is all there is.) All people of faith and good will need to rise up against such teaching which threatens to brainwash our children.