EVIDENCE THAT WOULD OR DOES TEND TO DISPROVE DARWINIAN MACROEVOLUTION;

1) Failure of accelerated time (extreme environmental stress) test in the laboratory to generate any truly novel change in a life form.  This is the case now.

2) Failure to find a complete set of fossils (given enough time) which show a fairly continuous set of micro evolution steps which generated a truly novel life form.  This is the case now.

3) Calculation of extreme improbabilities of generating the information based on simple survival selection from random variations in a reasonable time (The problem of genetic improbability.)  This is the case now.

4) Evidence of discontinuities between phyla of life forms not bridgeable with any reasonable probability by a set of small continuous changes.  This is the case now.

5) Life containing multiple control/feedback loops which would inherently be extremely improbable to have originated by linear additions.  This is the case even with the simplest life.

6) EVIDENCE OF NON RANDOM GENE MUTATIONS.

7) Irreducible structures or systems.   Read third full paragraph about molecular grenades with safety pin like structures which would destroy the life form without the safety pin molecules.  This is another chicken and egg problem for Darwinism.

Compare this evidence to the following reviews of Darwinist propaganda;

Responding to evolutionist propaganda in the media.

Review of propaganda on the discovery channel;  DARWINIST DOCUMENTARIES AND  DOGMATIC STORIES BY THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL

Science is not adaptive story telling.  Referring to the stories of evolution; "the rejection of one adaptive story usually leads to its replacement by another, rather than to a suspicion that a different kind of explanation might be required."  In other words, not open minded science when it comes to possible explanations of evolution.